首页> 外文OA文献 >Fast measurement of left ventricular mass using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging
【2h】

Fast measurement of left ventricular mass using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging

机译:实时三维超声心动图快速测量左心室质量:与磁共振成像的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background—Left ventricular (LV) mass is an important predictor of morbidity and mortality, especially in patients with systemic hypertension. However, the accuracy of 2D echocardiographic LV mass measurements is limited because acquiring anatomically correct apical views is often difficult. We tested the hypothesis that LV mass could be measured more accurately from real-time 3D (RT3D) data sets, which allow offline selection of nonforeshortened apical views, by comparing 2D and RT3D measurements against cardiac MR (CMR) measurements.Methods and Results—Echocardiographic imaging was performed (Philips 7500) in 21 patients referred for CMR imaging (1.5 T, GE). Apical 2- and 4-chamber views and RT3D data sets were acquired and analyzed by 2 independent observers. The RT3D data sets were used to select nonforeshortened apical 2- and 4-chamber views (3DQ-QLAB, Philips). In both 2D and RT3D images, LV long axis was measured; endocardial and epicardial boundaries were traced, and mass was calculated by use of the biplane method of disks. CMR LV mass values were obtained through standard techniques (MASS Analysis, GE). The RT3D data resulted in significantly larger LV long-axis dimensions and measurements of LV mass that correlated with CMR better (r=0.90) than 2D (r=0.79). The 2D technique underestimated LV mass (bias, 39%), whereas RT3D measurements showed only minimal bias (3%). The 95% limits of agreement were significantly wider for 2D (52%) than RT3D (28%). Additionally, the RT3D technique reduced the interobserver variability (37% to 7%) and intraobserver variability (19% to 8%).Conclusions—RT3D imaging provides the basis for accurate and reliable measurement of LV mass.
机译:背景-左心室(LV)质量是发病率和死亡率的重要预测指标,尤其是对于系统性高血压患者。但是,二维超声心动图左室质量测量的准确性有限,因为获取解剖学正确的根尖视图通常很困难。我们测试了以下假设:通过将2D和RT3D测量值与心脏MR(CMR)测量值进行比较,可以从实时3D(RT3D)数据集更准确地测量LV,从而可以离线选择未缩短的心尖视图。方法和结果—在21例接受CMR成像(1.5 T,GE)的患者中进行了超声心动图检查(Philips 7500)。由2位独立的观察员采集并分析了心尖2腔和4腔视图以及RT3D数据集。 RT3D数据集用于选择非缩短的心尖2腔和4腔视图(3DQ-QLAB,Philips)。在2D和RT3D图像中,均测量了LV长轴。追踪心内膜和心外膜的边界,并使用双平面盘法计算质量。通过标准技术(MASS Analysis,GE)获得CMR LV质量值。 RT3D数据导致LV长轴尺寸明显更大,并且与CMR相关的LV质量测量值(r = 0.90)比2D(r = 0.79)更好。 2D技术低估了左室质量(偏倚,39%),而RT3D测量仅显示了最小偏倚(3%)。 95%的协议限制对于2D(52%)明显比RT3D(28%)宽。此外,RT3D技术降低了观察者之间的变异性(37%至7%)和观察者内部的变异性(19%至8%)。结论—RT3D成像为准确,可靠地测量LV质量提供了基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号